A-CAPP Center Staff, 2020 The A-CAPP Center filed an amicus brief before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the Nike v. Wu case. The case confronts issues related to enforcement against trademark counterfeiters. The Center was joined in its brief by the AAFA. The Center team included: Kari Kammel, Jay Kennedy and Leah-Evert Burks, along with recent …
Kari Kammel and John Zacharia, 2020 When consumers buy items directly from brand owners online, consumers get exactly what they expect: the real item. Historically, when consumers bought online through an e-commerce platform, those same genuine items may also come directly from a brand owner or an authorized vendor. Today, however, third-party sellers have taken …
Emily Osika, 2019 Abstract The role of international cooperation through several transnational bodies provides countries the ability to cooperate on trademark enforcement mechanisms, allow for, and develop a global agenda on trademark enforcement. This is important because trademark violations are a global concern, in which countries and industries share an invested interest. Between the United …
The Role of International Cooperation on Trademark Enforcement Read More »
Kari Kammel, 2020 The enforcement of intellectual property (IP) rights varies widely from country to country. This article will examine the cultural context enveloping the enforcement of IP rights in the Middle East and posit some ideas for companies looking to understand or protect their IP in this region. While not an exhaustive list, several …
IP Rights in the Middle East: Cultural Complexities Behind Legal Enforcement Read More »
A-CAPP Center Staff, 2019 The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) is gathering information about the impact of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies on intellectual property law and policy. To assist in gathering this information, on August 27, 2019, the USPTO published questions related to the impact of artificial intelligence inventions on patent law and …
Kari Kammel, 2020 This Paper seeks to explore the complex dynamics of illicit trade, specifically the trade in counterfeit goods, the legal framework of two countries for comparison—the United States and United Arab Emirates—and other impacting factors such as free trade zones, corruption, and culture. To read the full article, visit digitalcommons.law.msu.edu.
